![]() ![]() As a little safety measure it does print the starting sha1 so you should be able to restore your old branch if anything goes wrong. I've only tested this a few times, so read it first and make sure you want to run it. ![]() The command is used to combine two branches and also to merge. Use it from your feature branch by running: The git merge command integrates the independent lines of development into a single branch. TOPIC="$(git branch | grep '\\*' | cut -d ' ' -f2)" \Įcho "Freebaseing $TOPIC onto $NEWBASE, previous sha1 was $PREVSHA1" \ Install it by placing the following alias in your. At the very end, it will allow you to use whatever commit message you like for your newly "freebased" branch. I'm calling it git freebase! It will take your existing messy, unrebasable feature branch and recreate it so that it becomes a new branch with the same name with its commits squashed into one commit and rebased onto the branch you specify (master by default). I have created my own git alias to do exactly this. The branch search is irrelevant and not merged in any way.From master, tag got merged: git merge tag.From tag a git merge -squash db was performed and then all changes were staged and committed in a single commit.When the db feature was ready, a new branch called tag was created in the same commit of master that db has its root.Over time, the master branch deviated from db.Nonetheless, the right one is more compact thanks to -squash. git merge -squash newFeature & git commit. In the following example, the left hand screenshot is the result of qgit and the right hand screenshot is the result of: git log -graph -decorate -pretty=oneline -abbrev-commitīoth screenshots show the same range of commits in the same repository. Merge newFeature branch into master with a custom commit: git merge -squash newFeature & git commit -m Your custom commit message If instead, you do. This wiki explains the procedure in detail. To truly see what would change in the master branch if you merged develop into it, right now: git merge-tree (git merge-base master develop) master develop As its a plumbing command, it does not guess what you mean, you have to be explicit. You can take a step back: git merge -abort Or you can solve the conflicts manually: git mergetool (and then commit your changes) But you may like another option: git rebase will take your changes away, fast forward the upstream branch to your local branch and then re-apply your changes. ![]() This way, the feature branch will contain only one commit and the merge will be represented in a short and tidy illustration. Merge the newly created branch into master.Merge into the above using git merge -squash.Create a new branch from the latest master, commit in the master branch where the feature branch initiated.Using git merge -squash as the accepted answer suggests does the trick but it will not show the merged branch as actually merged. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |